Help at Denver’s Stapleton Airport and at Boise’s Airport

Leave a comment

One Sunday at Church, Julie excitedly approached TerriLu in the foyer. “You’ll never believe what I’m about to tell you!”

“Okay,” responded TerriLu warily. “I’m listening.”

Julie asked, “Was your husband recently in Denver on a business trip?”

“Yes… Why?” asked TerriLu.

“Because he helped my friend Susan at the Denver airport and in the Boise airport.”

“Susan was in Colorado two weeks ago Thursday with her four young children. She was getting ready to board a flight to Boise to come see me for a week. She was trying to herd all the kids and all their luggage through the airport to their gate. A nice young man with black hair offered to help Susan and her children. He was carrying his own backpack and two additional bags. As they walked to the gate, he told her of his own beautiful wife and their three children, one girl and two boys.

While waiting at the gate, he talked to the kids and how excited they must be to ride on a jet airplane. The kids readily showed their enthusiasm as it was a first for all of them.

The man mentioned that he was a very frequent flyer on United Airlines and as his personal guests they could join him in early boarding on the aircraft, along with the First Class passengers and other frequent flyers. Soon the United attendant announced the flight over the loudspeaker and invited all First Class passengers and Premier Gold cardholders to board early. He explained that we were with him as the attendant glanced at his card and boarding pass. She then checked my boarding passes and probably assumed that we were family. She immediately looked for the next passenger as we filed past her into the jet-way.

He led the way down the narrow aisle of the Boeing 727 and dropped his own luggage on three seats near the front. He took us to our seats near the back of the aircraft and carefully loaded all of our luggage into the storage bins above our seats. He helped the kids buckle their seat belts and then wished them well on their maiden voyage. He made his way back to the front of the plane, stowed his own luggage, and then took his seat at the window. As he walked back up the aisle Susan first noticed his hair.

From her seat at the back of the airplane Susan realized that early boarding was truly a blessing as she saw many passengers struggling in the aisle and trying to stow their many bags.

The flight was uneventful – not even a little turbulence – and we soon touched down at the Boise airport. As I started unbuckling the kids I noticed he was already unloading our luggage from the overhead bins. He led us back up the aisle, grabbed his own carry-ons on the way, then up the jet-way, and into the Boise terminal. He took us to baggage claim although he had no baggage to claim. As we waited for our luggage he left to rent a baggage cart. When he returned, our bags had just arrived on the carousel. He loaded them (the bags, not the kids) onto the cart and led us to the Hertz car rental counter. I paid for the rental car as he asked the kids how they enjoyed their first flight. Of course, they loved it.

With keys in hand we went out the door to the rental car area. We found my car and he loaded the bags into the trunk and then helped buckle the kids in their seats. He opened the driver’s door for me and then wished us well.

Susan looked in the rearview mirror and saw that he was heading to the parking garage to retrieve his own vehicle and she then drove to my house in Meridian. She then told me of her adventure and described the black-haired man who had a white patch of hair at the back of his head. She forgot to mention how handsome he is but I overlooked that. He normally has to point out his good looks to people because they rarely see it on their own, except for his wife and daughter. That’s why he wears a pin-striped suit when he mows the lawn – so people will notice how good-looking he is. You don’t have to be good-looking to look good.

After Susan finished telling her tale to Julie, Julie laughed out loud and said she knew the name of that handsome black-haired man with the white spot of hair. Susan asked how on earth Julie could possibly know his identity when they hadn’t even exchanged names. Julie said, “Because of two things: One is the white patch of hair in his otherwise black-covered head, and two is because he’s always serving others anonymously without any recognition – not even for his alleged good looks.” Julie said, “His name is Bill Ross and he lives with his wife and kids just a few blocks away in this very neighborhood.”

Susan gasped, “You know him personally and his family?”

“Yep,” Julie replied proudly. “His wife’s name is TerriLu and their daughter is Melissa and the boys are Michael and Jonathan.”

“Wow, what a small world,” observed Susan.

“Yeah” agreed Julie. “It sure is.”

 

Back in the foyer at Church, Julie asked TerriLu, “Can you believe that?”

“Yes,” muttered TerriLu, shaking her head incredulously, “he never even tells me when he’s done something like that either.”

Happiness in the Home – Part 1

Leave a comment

  • Overlook others’ faults and overcome your own
  • Assume the best of intentions
  • Empathize-Weep with them that weep

In President Hinckley’s press announcement of the reorganization of the First Presidency, he said among other things, “We are concerned with the quality of family life within so many homes. The home is the seedbed of all true virtue. If proper values are not learned in the home, they are not likely to be learned anywhere” (Gordon B. Hinckley, Church News, April 8, 1995).  I’d like to discuss several principles that we can apply to increase love and happiness in our homes.

Before my wife and I got married I was sure that we would have a perfect marriage. I knew that we would always be happy and our home would always be spiritual. I was kind of like the bride on her wedding day who gushed to her mother: “Oh, Mom, now that I’m getting married I just know I’ve come to the end of all of my troubles!” And her wise, old mother replied, “That’s right, dear. You just don’t realize which end.”

A few days after TerriLu and I got married we found out that we might not automatically have a picture-perfect home on the inside. A big part of the problem was my own attitude at the time. I figured that any complications in our home were automatically TerriLu’s fault. After all, I was an Eagle scout so I was trustworthy, loyal, helpful, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent. I was also a returned missionary, a soon-to-be BYU graduate, and I even had a note from my mom that said I was special.

With that kind of resume I thought that I was nearly perfect and therefore any problems in the home must be TerriLu’s fault. For TerriLu it was like living with a general authority but in a different sense – I was generally an authority on everything. I felt I always had to be right. My way was always the right way whether we were hanging towels in the bathroom or loading the dishwasher or hanging clothes in the closet.

I didn’t realize then that these were simply differences in how we were each used to hanging towels in the bathroom or loading the dishwasher or hanging clothes in the closet, from having been raised in two different homes. Unfortunately, I felt then that my way was the right way and TerriLu’s way was the wrong way. That arrogant kind of attitude does not help improve the home.

I. Overlook others’ faults and overcome your own

It’s easy to find fault in others and see no fault in ourselves. The Savior taught that hypocrites look for the mote in someone else’s eye when they have a beam in their own. We need to overlook others’ faults and overcome our own.

The Silent Treatment

Many years ago we came home from Church on a Sunday and TerriLu was really tired. After we finished lunch, I suggested that she take a nap while I did the dishes. She took my advice, walked down the hallway, got into bed, and went to sleep. Well, that kind of bothered me because I didn’t really want to do the dishes while she took a nap – I was just being a considerate husband by offering. I didn’t expect her to really take me up on the offer. Actually, if she had been as perfect a person as I was she would have said, “Oh, no, Bill. Why don’t you take a nap and I’ll do the dishes.” That way the dishes would have gotten done and I could have gotten some rest. I thought it was rather inconsiderate of her and I was just a bit bothered. But a perfect young husband I didn’t want to call her on her mistake.

Now the most effective way to let someone know you are bothered is to give them the silent treatment. Since most of you have probably never given or gotten the silent treatment, I better explain it. When your wife, for example, is bothering you, you just mope around and when she asks what’s wrong, you say, “Nothing.” Later on she says, “Come on. Something’s wrong. What is it?” And you respond, “No, there’s nothing wrong. Nothing’s wrong. I’m just tired.” Now she knows that she has done so something upset you and it must be something so terrible you can’t even bear to talk about it. You give the silent treatment and hopefully she will feel guilty and will recognize that she caused the problem and should feel very sorry for you, and you, in fact, feel sorry for yourself.

I should point out that the silent treatment is one of the most un-Christlike behaviors known to humankind. I believe it is right down there near the unpardonable sin. With the silent treatment, the other person doesn’t know what’s wrong and therefore can’t help the situation. Some people can stretch the silent treatment go on for hours and the experts can stretch it out for days. My own ability was probably in the excellent category – I could go for many days when the offense warranted it.

Now, in order to effectively implement the silent treatment, you’ve got to have her around to feel sorry for you. Otherwise, it’s just a waste of energy. With TerriLu sound asleep, the silent treatment wasn’t the best method for showing my frustration with her having done exactly what I suggested she do.

It’s amazing how noisy you can be while cleaning the kitchen with all those pots and pans and cupboards and drawers. Unfortunately, the kitchen was too far from the bedroom and TerriLu was really out cold. So I decided to be a considerate family member and clean the bathroom right next to the master bedroom, which also had a few cupboards and drawers that could make some noise. Well, before I could finish cleaning the bathroom, TerriLu came out of the bedroom and asked, “What’s wrong?”

Now that she was awake, I could switch to the silent treatment. When I said, “Nothing!” she realized that I was feeling sorry for myself and she knew why. She went straight to the kitchen and started sweeping the floor. Since she didn’t seem to be feeling very sorry for me, sweetly and hypocritically and dryly, “Why aren’t you taking a nap?” and she answered, “You know why.”

Rather than bore you with the rest of the juicy details of that story, let me just point out a few things. I was trying to blame TerriLu for something that was not her fault. I was finding fault with her instead of looking at myself. I was trying to find a little speck in her eye when I had a giant two-by-four sticking out of my own eye.

It isn’t healthy for the relationship to blame the other  person and then try to make her feel guilty when it’s not her fault…or even it is her fault. You just don’t do it.

Now, if you have any or all of these problems – that is, blaming others especially your own, justifying your own shortcomings, or giving the silent treatment, sulking or feeling sorry for yourself, I should hereby immediately  call you to repentance, but I am just the speaker today not your bishop. I think I’ll just quote President Dieter F. Uchtdorf who during the April 2012 general conference, said succinctly and emphatically in two words, “Stop it!!!” (April General Conference, April General Conference).

The silent treatment is not Christlike behavior. This is not an appropriate way to treat anyone, especially someone with whom you plan to spend eternity. I wish someone had called me to repentance or told me emphatically to “stop it” when I was a new husband because if I had followed that counsel, it would have saved many moments and days of agony and grief in our marriage because of my behavior.

I was wrong – dead wrong.  Finally I stopped this horrible behavior on my own but only after several years. I stopped for several reasons: I realized that: 1) I realized how much it hurt my wife and how unfair it was to treat her in that manner. 2) I realized that this was not the proper way to communicate with my wife. 3) I realized that I had simply learned this behavior in my home growing up: No one ever yelled in my parent’s home – if you had a problem or were upset with a family member you just shut down and gave the silent treatment in a cruel attempt to punish the other person and lay the blame for your feelings directly at her feet. My parents meant well on their part – t was probably just their upbringing, too,

It’s interesting that someone did actually call me to repentance for giving the silent treatment. In October 1976 I had been at Ricks College (now BYU-Idaho) for just over a month in my first year of college just before my mission. Curt Lords lived in the apartment next door and was a returned missionary who I truly admired and looked up to with awe. He apparently had seen me giving the silent treatment and sulking more than once in those first five weeks at college. One day when I was feeling sorry for myself, he suddenly snapped at me, “Bill, you are really ugly to be around when you pull this “crud.” Curt actually used a more colorful four-letter word that starts with “cr” which I consider a swear word that is inappropriate to be used by Latter-day Saints. So Curt’s stern tone-of-voice and the use of that “almost swear word,” especially at a Church college, totally shocked me. I vowed then and there to never sulk or give the silent treatment around anyone ever again or feel sorry myself.

And I stayed true to that vow all through the remaining seven months at Ricks College, all through my two-year mission, when I got home from my mission, and all through our engagement of four months.

And then TerriLu and I got married. Once she was family, I lapsed back into my horrible habit that I had grown up with and had mastered in my own family. To this day I still feel sorrow for my sweet wife who had to put up with my un-Christlike silent treatment, sulking, feeling sorry for myself, and general moodiness for those years in the beginning of our marriage, and never deserved a bit of my silent treatment. How sad that I would treat the love of my life and my best friend on earth in such a cruel manner.

Now, today, occasionally I need a little time to “brood” about something or “mull” something over, but my wife and I both know I am not trying to punish her with the silent treatment, sulking, feeling sorry for myself, or being moody – I’m just taking a little time to process something within myself, and she happily gives me that space when it’s needed occasionally. And she knows that I’m NOT shutting her out or blaming her and punishing her with sulking, the silent treatment, sulking, or moodiness.

Today, if you exhibit any of the just-mentioned behaviors you need to sit down with your spouse or your children or your parents or your siblings, and you need to commit to change. You may need to ask them for help to remind you what you are doing it absently when your relapse back into your old habit. And you must not be angry when the call you on it. They will gladly help with alacrity! And if you’re not willing to change this awful behavior, well, I just hope you have some heat-proof, asbestos long johns for where you’ll be spending eternity.

The Perfect Marriage or the Perfect Person

Now let’s talk about the perfect marriage and the perfect person. At first, when TerriLu and I were married, I thought I was supposed to be perfect and I became blind to my own weaknesses. I thought if TerriLu would just change we would have a perfect home. It took a few years for me to understand that we cannot become perfect in this life. Even the Savior, who was perfect in this life, did not claim perfection until after His death and resurrection. In the Sermon on the Mount, as a mortal being, he said, “Be ye therefore perfect even as your father which is in heaven is perfect.” A short time later, when he appeared to the Nephites after his resurrection, he said, “…ye [should] be perfect even as I or your father in heaven is perfect.”

It’s so easy to blame others and feel sorry for yourself. or to say, “You make me so mad.” We’ll have happier homes if we learn to overlook others’ weaknesses and focus on overcoming our own weaknesses. We were still happily married when we were young, but my unkind habit certainly did not enhance our marriage. I wasn’t trying to be unkind to my sweetheart, but it was unkind. It was a bad habit developed over a long time that I needed to overcome in myself.

Now have I become a perfect husband? If you ask TerriLu, she’ll say “Yes, he is” because she knows she’ll get the silent treatment if she doesn’t. No, actually, our home has just become a lot better off since I started changing my shortcomings instead of trying to prove that I had no shortcomings and as I stopped looked for shortcomings in TerriLu that I thought was my priesthood duty as a husband to help her overcome. We will find weaknesses in others, if that’s what we are looking for in them.

The book of Ether clearly tells us to look for our own weaknesses and overcome them. “And if men come unto me I will show unto them their weakness.” Notice that it’s not the husband’s place to show his wife her weaknesses. Actually, it says, “…if men come unto me…” So maybe women don’t have any weaknesses or if they do the Lord doesn’t even need to show them their weaknesses  because they already know them. Of course, “men” is the old way of referring to all people combined.

The scripture continues, “I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; and my grace is sufficient for all men that humble themselves before me; for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them.”

Conversion of my Father, William E. Ross Jr. – Part 2

Leave a comment

Getting Answers through Prayer

One time as a teenager I went to Dad with a decision that I was struggling with. He admonished me to pray about it which I had done and which I did again. When I came back later and said I still didn’t seem to get an answer, he said, “Well, this is what I think you should do…. Now,” he said, “go and ask the Lord if your father’s counsel is what He would have you do.” I did and it was.

Serving Others and Missionary Work

I’ve always liked the unfortunate saying, “When all is said and done, a lot more has been said than done.” Not with Dad. While Dad, in fact, said a lot through talks and lessons, he did a lot more than he said. He didn’t expect anyone to do anything that he wasn’t doing himself. He taught by example—he practiced what he preached.

Dad had the biggest heart of anyone I know (although it underwent significant reconstruction during his quintuple-bypass surgery.)

It was filled with love for everyone. I don’t think he ever met a person he didn’t like. He couldn’t even stay mad at the squirrels who pilfered his walnut tree. Dad loved his in-law children as much as his own children, understanding that the marriage covenant is just as thick as any blood relationship, if not, thicker.

Dad would strike up a conversation with anyone. He loved to meet people, everyone, anyone, complete strangers. A few times he called us in Boise to say we might be getting a phone call from some people he met somewhere around Everett. They were going to be traveling through Boise later that summer, and he had invited them to stay overnight at our place on their way through—complete strangers! Our response was usually an incredulous, “Daaad, you said they could what?”

But this was not foreign to him—he lived the principles he taught. Once while managing, ironically, a casket manufacturing company in north Everett, he hired a consultant from out of town. When George Tucker arrived, Dad told him that he shouldn’t stay at a cold, heartless hotel for two weeks. Instead, he should come and stay at our home. George Tucker did come to our home and our home went on as usual: Two family prayers a day, blessings on the food, scripture reading, and Family Home Evening. A month or two later George came again to stay at our home, having had some time to ponder the questions Dad had posed to him. Questions like, “George, have you ever wondered why God called prophets anciently, but not today?” And “Have you ever wondered why God gave us scripture long ago, but not today?” And you’re ahead of me again. Yes, George Tucker joined the church, along with his wife and their children.

Dad loved genealogy, family history, and temple work. Due to his own busy life, Dad didn’t have a lot of time to do much genealogy personally, but he sent a lot of money to the Genealogy Center in Salt Lake City where expert genealogists researched his lineage for him. Over the years they mined hundreds and hundreds of names, many for whom Dad personally did some or all of the temple work.

When he could no longer serve as a stake patriarch because of his health, he still went to the temple with assistance, almost every Thursday, and spent much of the day there. Later, after a series of strokes, he was no longer able to even manage one session at the temple, which saddened him a great deal. A year later, he passed away in 2004, a year after my mother passed away. I’m sure that much of my father’s time in the spirit world is spent teaching his ancestors the gospel of Jesus Christ and then taking them to the temple to witness the ordinances being done for and in their behalf.

Women and Men: Equal and Differing Assignments – Part 2

Leave a comment

Women of the Church

Many have said that the way the Lord selects a new bishop is fairly simple. He finds the most spiritual and righteous person in the ward and then calls her husband to be the bishop. While that is often said tongue-in-cheek when new bishops are called, I believe there is more truth to the matter than tongue-in-cheek, not only about the bishop’s wife but also about women in general.

In June 2010, at the training for new mission presidents, President Boyd K. Packer the second most senior Apostle of Jesus Christ after President Thomas S. Monson, said to the mission presidents’ wives, “You have an insight, a spiritual insight superior to that of your husband. We do not like to admit that, but it’s true.” (Church News, July 3, 2010, page 6, Mission President Training).

And, Brethren, I’m not making this up. You can look it up in the Church News from July 3, 2010, page 6, to be specific. I testify with President Packer that women in general, especially those in the Church, have “a spiritual insight superior to that of [men].” Good husbands in the Church are humble enough to recognize that eternal truth.

In 1976, President N. Eldon Tanner spoke about area conferences being held around the world and said, “The speakers emphasize the great role women have in the Church and its auxiliary organizations and in the community, and the great influence they have in the lives of their families. They are reminded that they could have no greater responsibility or satisfying experience than to be copartners with God in the divine plan of bringing his spirit children into mortal existence, to teach them the gospel, and to help prepare them to go back into the presence of our Heavenly Father” (“The Purpose of Conferences,” N. Eldon Tanner, October 1976 General Conference).

President David O. McKay promised every man who uses the priesthood in righteousness that he “will find his life sweetened, his discernment sharpened to decide quickly between right and wrong, his feelings tender and compassionate, yet his spirit strong and valiant in defense of right; he will find the priesthood a never failing source of happiness – a well of living water springing up into eternal life” (Teachings of Presidents of the Church: David O. McKay [2003], page 116. Also, see Gospel Principles manual [1978, 2009], page 71).

I believe the same can be said of righteous women simply because of their innate nature without a need to hold the priesthood. We can paraphrase President McKay’s promise to say that every woman who lives in righteousness “will find her life sweetened, her discernment sharpened to decide quickly between right and wrong, her feelings tender and compassionate, yet her spirit strong and valiant in defense of right; she will find a never failing source of happiness – a well of living water springing up into eternal life.”

In a talk entitled “A Tribute to Women” delivered at the Priesthood Commemoration Fireside broadcast by satellite from Temple Square on May 7, 1989, President Boyd K. Packer said:

The whole physical universe is organized in order that man and woman might fulfill the full measure of their creation….

“The Lord revealed that the purpose of it all is ‘to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.’ (Moses 1:39.) Ordinances and covenants were ordained to protect this power to generate life….

“The compelling need which draws a husband back to his wife is always to be expressed in tenderness and love. It is through this process that a wife may give her husband, and a husband his wife, a gift which can be received in no other way—the gift of children.

“The separate natures of man and woman were designed by the Father of us all to fulfill the purposes of the gospel plan.

“Never can two of the same gender fulfill the commandment to multiply and replenish the earth. No two men or any number added to them, no matter how much priesthood they may think they possess, can do it. Only a woman can bestow upon man that supernal title of father.

She in turn becomes a mother. Can anyone dispute that her part is different from and more demanding than his? The mother must endure limitations while nature performs the miracle of creation….

The well-being of the mother, the child, the family, the Church, indeed of all humanity depends upon protecting that process. The obligations of motherhood are never-ending. The addition of such duties as those which attend ordination to the priesthood would constitute an intrusion into, an interruption to, perhaps the avoidance of, that crucial contribution which only a mother can provide.

The limitation of priesthood responsibilities to men is a tribute to the incomparable place of women in the plan of salvation.

“The prophet who said that “no success [in any field of endeavor] can compensate for failure in the home” (David O. McKay) did not exempt callings in the Church.

“Men and women have complementary, not competing, responsibilities. There is difference but not inequity. Intelligence and talent favor both of them. But in the woman’s part, she is not just equal to man; she is superior! She can do that which he can never do; not in all eternity can he do it. There are complementing rewards which are hers and hers alone….

And the highest ordinances in the House of the Lord they receive together and equally or not at all!

“It should not disturb either men or women that some responsibilities are bestowed upon one and not the other. Duties of the priesthood are delegated to men and are patriarchal, which means ‘of the father….’

“…Have we not been told that “the rights of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven, and that the powers of heaven cannot be controlled nor handled only upon the principles of righteousness” and that “no power or influence can or ought to be maintained by virtue of the priesthood, only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned?” (D&C 121:36, 41.)

Ought not those virtues by which the priesthood must govern apply first and always to our wives and children, to our families?….

Holders of the priesthood, in turn, must accommodate themselves to the needs and responsibilities of the wife and mother. Her physical and emotional and intellectual and cultural well-being and her spiritual development must stand first among his priesthood duties.

“There is no task, however menial, connected with the care of babies, the nurturing of children, or with the maintenance of the home that is not his equal obligation. The tasks which come with parenthood, which many consider to be below other tasks, are simply above them….

When our sons were growing up, they enjoyed a very broad tolerance from their father toward their mischief and mistakes. But there was no tolerance for even the slightest disrespect toward their mother.

And the question our daughters-in-law have heard most often from me has been, ‘Is he being good to you?

“As our sons have matured, I have ordained each in turn to the priesthood. Somehow that seems the lesser part. I have but ordained them. She has borne them, then trained and nurtured them….

“I could not possibly express the depth and the intensity of love and gratitude that I feel toward my wife, the mother of our children.

Without her, I could not have the highest and most enduring blessings of this ‘priesthood … after the holiest order of God(D&C 84:18), this ‘Holy Priesthood, after the Order of the Son of God (D&C 107:3). For, ‘in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage]; And if he does not, he cannot obtain it.’ (D&C 131:104.) (“A Tribute to Women,” Boyd K. Packer, Ensign, July 1989).

“In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees; And in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage]; And if he does not, he cannot obtain it” (D&C 131:1-3).

Years ago the First Presidency issued a profound and powerful statement. “Motherhood,” they wrote, “is near to divinity. It is the highest, holiest service to be assumed by mankind. It places her who honors its holy calling and service next to the angels.” (In James R. Clark, comp., Messages of the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 6 volumes. (1965-75), 6: 178.)

The First Presidency also stated, “The true spirit of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints gives to woman the highest place of honor in human life” (in Messages of the First Presidency, 6:5).

Elder Boyd K. Packer said that a man’s “first and foremost priesthood duty is to attend to his wife’s physical, emotional, intellectual, and cultural well-being, and her spiritual development” (Ensign, July 1989, page 75).

Elder Russell M. Nelson adds, “Because mothers are essential to God’s great plan of happiness, their sacred work is opposed by Satan, who would destroy the family and demean the worth of women” (Ensign, May 1999).

These concepts in no way demean or demote men—they simply establish his sacred role along side of the woman’s sacred role. The man’s responsibility with the priesthood is to serve and assist the Savior and the Woman in their sacred roles.

With the priesthood, the man provides support to the woman in her sacred role of bearing and rearing children as he presides and provides in the home. He keeps a roof overhead and food on the table, he names and blesses newborn babies, he gives priesthood blessings to the woman and father’s blessings to the children, he gives blessings to heal and comfort, he counsels with his wife as they together plan their future, and he learns to exercise the priesthood by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned, by kindness, and pure knowledge, without hypocrisy, and without guile (D&C 121:41-42).

Some men erroneously feel that they have the right to rule over their wives and children because God said to Eve, “Thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee” (Genesis 3:16).

First, President Spencer W. Kimball said he would change the word “rule” to “preside” (Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, page 316; “Unrighteous Dominion,” H. Burke Peterson, Ensign, July 1989).

Second, if the husband thinks he still should “rule over” his wife, then he should read where Matthew quotes an Old Testament prophet (Micah 5:2) regarding Jesus Christ being born in Bethlehem, “for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall “rule” my people Israel” (Matthew 2:6). Now, take a look at the footnote “d” associated with the word “rule.” In the footnote it says that the Greek word for “rule” means to “tend, protect, and nurture.” I testify that the husband’s role is to “tend, protect, and nurture” his wife and children, among other noble assignments to uplift and strengthen his wife and family.

Also with the priesthood, the man provides support to the Savior in His sacred role of spiritually preparing men and women to be born again as magnifies his callings in the priesthood. The man performs the ordinances of salvation associated with the rebirth and serves to build up the Lord’s kingdom. He serves in priesthood leadership positions, he home teaches, he seeks inspiration and counsels the saints, and through all of this priesthood service, he learns to magnify the priesthood.

President James E. Faust observed that femininity “is the divine adornment of humanity. It finds expression in your … capacity to love, your spirituality, delicacy, radiance, sensitivity, creativity, charm, graciousness, gentleness, dignity, and quiet strength. It is manifest differently in each girl or woman, but each … possesses it. Femininity is part of your inner beauty.” (Womanhood: The Highest Place of Honor,” Ensign, May 2000, 96.)

President Hugh B. Brown once said at a Relief Society conference: “There are people fond of saying that women are the weaker instruments, but I don’t believe it. Physically they may be, but spiritually, morally, religiously, and in faith, what man can match a woman who is really converted to the gospel! Women are more willing to make sacrifices than are men, more patient in suffering, more earnest in prayer. They are the peers and often superior to men in resilience, in goodness, in morality, and in faith.” (Relief Society Conference, Sept. 29, 1965.)

Elder Russell M. Nelson said, “A woman’s richest rewards will come as she rises to fulfill her destiny as a devoted daughter of God. To all faithful Saints He has promised thrones, kingdoms, principalities, glory, immortality, and eternal lives. (See Rom. 2:7; D&C 75:5; D&C 128:12, 23; D&C 132:19.) That is the potential for women in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is exalting, everlasting, and divine. (“Women – Of Infinite Worth,” Russell M. Nelson, General Conference, October 1989).

President Heber J. Grant said, “Without the wonderful work of the women I realize that the Church would have been a failure” (Gospel Standards, comp. G. Homer Durham, Salt Lake City: Improvement Era, 1941, page 150).

President Spencer W. Kimball said, “Brethren, we cannot be exalted without our wives. There can be no heaven without righteous women” (Ensign, November 1979, page 5).

President James E. Faust said, “A husband should always try to treat his wife with the greatest courtesy and respect, holding her in the highest esteem. He should speak to her in a kind and a soft manner, showing his love by word and deed.” (The Highest Place of Honor – Women,” James E. Faust, General Conference, October 1988).

President James E. Faust also said, “When you boys become priests and elders and begin to date, you need to know that the best place to date is at Church and Church-related activities. As you date, you will be entrusted by a girl’s parents with their most cherished blessing. You will have the responsibility to protect not only her well-being, but also her honor, even above your own safety. One of the duties of manhood is to safeguard womanhood. When you become a parent, you cannot shirk this responsibility to be concerned for the dating of your own children.

“Before my first mission, when I was attending the university, I invited a lovely young lady to attend the university’s junior prom dinner dance. I had dated this fine girl a few times before. Every time we came home from a date, her father would be in his big leather chair, fully dressed, waiting for us.

“As I went to pick her up the evening of the dance at the university, her father said, “What time will you be home?” I responded, “Sir, as you know, this is a special dinner-dance at the university; the dinner is scheduled to be served after the dance, so we would like to stay out later than usual.” I added, “You may not wish to wait up for us that late.” He simply said, “I will be waiting for you.” The dance was special, but the dinner service was terribly slow. I soon developed indigestion. The longer it went, the worse I felt. When we got back to her home, I found the father had kept his promise. There in his big leather chair was this wonderful, concerned family patriarch waiting for one of his fine daughters to be safely back under his own roof. He said something like this, “What keeps you out so late, James?” (The Highest Place of Honor – Women,” James E. Faust, General Conference, October 1988).

President James E. Faust went on to say, “It is a grave responsibility and a transcendent blessing when a man and a woman make vows and covenants and receive the ordinances of marriage. When within the covenant of marriage a man and a woman invoke the great powers of creation, they literally become partners with God in creating new human life. Thereafter a man has a sacred obligation of support, care, and protection for his helpmate and the children he has fathered. (The Highest Place of Honor – Women,” James E. Faust, General Conference, October 1988).

President James E. Faust also said, “The priesthood cannot work out its destiny, nor can God’s purposes be fulfilled, without our helpmates. Mothers perform a labor the priesthood cannot do. For this supernal gift of life the priesthood should have love unbounded for the mothers of their children. Men should give them honor, gratitude, reverence, respect, and praise. A man who fails to gratefully acknowledge his debt to his own mother who gave him life is insensitive to the Holy Spirit. I wish to acknowledge to both my mother and my wife a debt which is so great I shall never be able to repay it.” (The Highest Place of Honor – Women,” James E. Faust, General Conference, October 1988).

Finally, President Faust said, “I do not believe that God’s purposes on earth will ever be achieved without the influence, strength, love, support, and special gifts of the elect women of God. They are entitled to our deepest veneration, our fullest appreciation, and our most profound respect. I believe angels attend them in their motherly ministry.” (The Highest Place of Honor – Women,” James E. Faust, General Conference, October 1988).

President Gordon B. Hinckley said, “Woman is God’s supreme creation. Only after the earth had been formed, after the day had been separated from the night, after the waters had been divided from the land, after vegetation and animal life had been created, and after man had been placed on the earth, was woman created; and only then was the work pronounced complete and good.

“Of all the creations of the Almighty, there is none more beautiful, none more inspiring than a lovely daughter of God who walks in virtue with an understanding of why she should do so, who honors and respects her body as a thing sacred and divine, who cultivates her mind and constantly enlarges the horizon of her understanding, who nurtures her spirit with everlasting truth.” (“Our Responsibility to Our Young Women,” Ensign, September 1988, page 11).

President N. Eldon Tanner gave a talk entitled “No Greater Honor: The Woman’s Role” in which he said, “The whole purpose of the creation of the earth was to provide a dwelling place where the spirit children of God might come and be clothed in mortal bodies and, by keeping their second estate, prepare themselves for salvation and exaltation. The whole purpose of the mission of Jesus Christ was to make possible the immortality and eternal life of man. The whole purpose of mothers and fathers should be to live worthy of this blessing and to assist God the Father and his son Jesus Christ in their work. No greater honor could be given to woman than to assist in this divine plan, and I wish to say without equivocation that a woman will find greater satisfaction and joy and make a greater contribution to mankind by being a wise and worthy mother raising good children than she could make in any other vocation…. I would urge all husbands, fathers, sons, and brothers to show our great respect and love and try to be worthy of the women who are our wives, mothers, daughters, sisters, and sweethearts. There is no surer way for a man to show his lack of character, of good breeding, and of quality than for him to show lack of respect for woman or to do anything that would discredit or degrade her. It is unchristianlike, unfair, and displeasing to God for any husband or father to assume the role of dictatorship and adopt the attitude that he is superior in any way to his wife.” (“No Greater Honor: The Woman’s Role,” N. Eldon Tanner, October 1973).

How to Accommode the Rapid Growth in a Worldwide Church – Role of the Seventy – Part 4

Leave a comment

President Boyd K. Packer on the Role of the Seventy

(lds.org online: Role of the Seventy – interview with President Boyd K. Packer, President of the Quorum of the Twelve and Elder Ronald A. Rasband, senior president of the Seventy).

The Restoration brought with it revelations regarding priesthood offices, the relationship between the presiding councils of the Church, and the organization of quorums that strengthen and sustain each other in furthering the work of the Lord.

“When we tried to figure out [how to manage the Church] as it grew in numbers and then as it grew in distance, it was obvious that the Twelve could not do what the Twelve did [at that time] by way of visiting the stakes,” President Packer said.

“There was a time I can remember when we could say that every stake president during that year had shaken hands with a member of the Twelve. And as the Church grew and grew in distant parts of the world, the question of how we would manage it, how we would teach it, how we would administer it [also grew and grew]. The answer, of course, is in the revelations. The answer is the Seventies. The Twelve, as the revelations direct, should ‘call upon the Seventy … instead of any others’ ” (see D&C 107:38–39).

During the interview, Elder Rasband asked President Packer to trace the history of the Seventy during the 50 years he has served as a General Authority and to explain how their role has become clarified and expanded through revelation.

“When I first came to this building,” President Packer said, “there were seven Presidents of the Seventy, … venerable men that knew the history of the Church because they had lived it. The Seventies Quorum was not used much. There were a total of 26 General Authorities, and for the most part the Seventies would go out to stake conferences. They had no administrative duties at all. That was very comfortable.

“And then something happened. The Church started to grow, and it has never stopped growing,” he said. The twelfth President of the Church, President Spencer W. Kimball (1895–1985), “called three men in addition to the seven [presidents]. That made ten. And with that, the First Quorum of the Seventy was in existence. That could be enlarged to the number of seventy. That took care of it for a while. But President Kimball had the vision, and with that the First Quorum of the Seventy [was] organized, [and] then step by step the Second Quorum of the Seventy was organized.” There are now eight quorums and more than 320 Seventies and Area Seventies serving throughout the world.

Extending the Keys

President Packer said that questions were raised along the way, but the answers were always found by studying the scriptures and praying for inspiration. For example, “Would they all be General Authorities? That posed some problems that were solved when it was determined all the General Authorities did not need to live at headquarters.”

Later, he said, it was determined that the Seventy could reorganize stakes and call stake presidents, which brought “the whole doctrine of keys … into focus,” because stake presidents must have keys to preside.

“The stake president has to have keys, keys of the presidency of the stake. Well, if a member of the Twelve was there, he could easily give them. What would happen if it is a Seventy? Well, Seventies by delegation can do anything the Twelve tell them to do, and they can confer keys, which would be an extension of the keys of the Twelve.”

“We went through several steps of having regional representatives and area representatives and so on, and now we have Area Seventies,” President Packer said, responding to a question from Elder Rasband. “My statement on that is ‘a Seventy is a Seventy is a Seventy.’ An Area Seventy has the same authority, but it is proscribed by area, and the General Authority Seventies do not have that limitation. But an Area Seventy holds [the Melchizedek] Priesthood and has all the authority that you do as the Senior President of the Seventy.”

The Patterns of Revelation

President Packer said it is marvelous that Joseph Smith could have anticipated an organization that would expand to meet the needs of the Church worldwide. “The revelations came when he was a very young man,” President Packer said. “How he knew what he knew, I was going to say it was incredible. It is not, because he did not have to know much. All he had to do is follow the patterns of revelation.”

He noted that John Taylor, the third President of the Church (1808–1887), along with his counselors, “had a question about what to do with the Seventies. And so they prayed about it and pondered about it, and they wrote out a declaration which would be in the language of revelation. After they had it all written out, they went to the Lord.

“I have always thought that was very interesting that they thought and acted and prayed first, and then President Taylor received a revelation that says what they had written was the will of the Lord. And then the Lord told them at that time that anything else they needed in reference to the Church and how it would operate and the priesthood and how it would function would be given them from time to time. And that is the way it has been.” (See Messages of the First Presidency, 5:354.)

Currently, there are more than 320 Seventy from 53 countries—and speaking 39 languages—serving in the Church. They are organized into eight quorums. Members of the First and Second Quorums are General Authorities of the Church and may serve anywhere in the world where called. Members of the Third through the Eighth Quorums are Area Seventies and are authorized to serve only in the area to which they are assigned. However, the authority of the General Authority and Area Seventy is the same with regard to assignments given by the Twelve.

Elder Rasband pointed out [to President Packer] that “under the keys and the witness of the Twelve, the Seventy have that same power that you are describing now,” and President Packer responded, “That was not talked about until just in our generation, what could a Seventy do out there.” But, he said, there is an answer to the question: “He could do anything that he is assigned to do.

Prayer Children’s Chatter Part 2

Leave a comment

      Jonathan (3) was saying the family prayer one night. “Thankful that we could pwant (plant) some little seeds,” he said. “And please bwess them to be big, stwong, daddy seeds.”

*  *  *  *

      During a family prayer just a few weeks before William was born, Jonathan (3) prayed, “And please bwess the baby that it will come out and won’t pop out.”

*  *  *  *

      Jonathan (3) was saying a blessing on the food. “Heavenly Father. Thank thee for the…” He stopped and pointing, whispered, “What’s this, Mom?”
      “Ala,” she whispered back.
      “Thank thee for the Ala.” Then he continued, “And thank thee for the…what’s this, Mom?”
      “Barbecue chicken.”
      “Thank thee for the barbecue chicken. And thank thee for the…what’s this, Mom?”
      “Zucchini bread.”
      “Thank thee for the zucchini bwead (bread).”
      Not wanting to asked about the broccoli, he improvised, “And thank thee for the little trees.”

*  *  *  *

      During a family night lesson on prayer, the kids discussed what they should be doing while praying. They drew pictures to remind them that the eyes should be closed, the arms should be folded, and the heart should be listening for an answer to prayer. As a review at the end of the lesson they looked at the pictures and I asked what each part of the body should be doing during prayer. Hoping they had picked up the most important point about the heart listening for answers, I asked Michael (6), “What should your heart be doing during prayer?”
      Michael thought for a moment and guessed, “Pumping?”

*  *  *  *

      During a family prayer while on an out-of-state vacation, Jonathan (6) prayed, “And bless our home to be safe.” He paused a moment and then added, “And bless all our other homes that we’ve lived in.”

*  *  *  *

       Grammy came to visit for Christmas. As everyone sat down for dinner, I asked William (2) if he would like to show Grammy how he could say the blessing on the food. William bowed his head and without any prompting offered, “Heavenwy Fathow. Amen.”

*  *  *  *

      During a family prayer one evening Jonathan (6) said, “And bless all the people we know.” He paused and then added, “And bless all the people even if we don’t know ‘em.”

*  *  *  *

      For several months, William (2) insisted on always saying the family prayer and the blessing on the food, with the family’s only reprieve coming when William was asleep at prayer time. One Sunday at church, Mommy leaned over and said, “William, fold your arms. It’s time to say the prayer.”
      Just as the man started to pray, William protested loudly, “But I want to say it!”

*  *  *  *

      Mommy and the kids had been a few minutes late for the early-morning Cub Scout camp every day that week, and every morning during family prayer, they had prayed, “Help us to be on time tomorrow.”
      On Friday, the last day of camp, they were late again. During the morning family prayer, Michael (9) prayed, “And help us to be on time…” he paused, “…next year.”

*  *  *  *

      “I said a prayer in my head,” William (4) announced proudly one morning.
      “What did you say?” asked Mommy.
      “Well,” replied William tipping his head toward Mom, “you look.”

*  *  *  *

      After a blessing on the food William (4) looked down at Suki, Grammy’s collie, and asked, “How do dogs say the blessing?”

*  *  *  *

     One morning I helped William (4) say the family prayer. William tractably echoed my words until he thought the prayer had gone long enough. As I took a breath between sentences, William quickly started to conclude, “In the name of Jesus Christ.” He sneaked a quick peek out of the corner of his eye at Daddy who was smiling along with the rest of the family, and finished, “Amen.”

*  *  *  *

      One morning William (4), TerriLu, and I had a family prayer after the big kids had scrambled out the door to go to school. William gave the prayer and sincerely petitioned, “And please bless the kids.”

*  *  *  *

      One evening Michael (10), the mathematician in the making, came up with a new way of describing something that is perfect, complete, or one hundred percent. During a family prayer he fervently prayed, “And we’re glad that we have a ninety-nine-point-infinity percent chance of getting back to heaven.”

*  *  *  *

      One evening Mommy gave a particularly long family prayer. William (4) grew a little impatient. He lifted his head from his folded arms and gently interrupted, “Please stop now.”
      When Mommy continued with the prayer, William suggested firmly, “Say, ‘In the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.’”

*  *  *  *

      One evening I offered an unusually long-winded family prayer. William (4), who was used to having others help him with his prayers, waited for Daddy to take a breath and quickly prompted, “In the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.”

*  *  *  *

      As the family gathered in the upstairs hallway for family prayer one evening, I happened to kneel on the top of the landing with my feet hanging off the step. As William (4) kneeled cozily on Mom’s thighs while she kneeled, he considered my precarious position and observed, “You’re kneeling in the dangerous place and I’m kneeling in the best place.”

*  *  *  *

      While waiting for family prayer before school one morning, William (5) got down on his tummy with his knees pressed against the wall and his feet resting up on the wall. “Hey, look guys!” he announced proudly. “I’m kneeling on the wall.”

*  *  *  *

Dogs are People Too

1 Comment

Dogs quickly adapt to a family lifestyle. And they either think they are people in a family or they think the family members are dogs in a pack. Even our children had a hard time distinguishing between the dogs and the humans.

In 1985 we got a nervous, older dog from the pound and named her Ginger. One day TerriLu asked Michael, age 3, “What’s the difference between you and Ginger?”

“I’m a boy and Ginger’s a girl,” replied Michael. Notice, he didn’t say, “I’m a boy and Ginger’s a dog” but “I’m a boy and Ginger’s a girl.”

One evening as I passed through the kitchen I glanced at Twinkie and called her by one of her nicknames. “Hi, Stinky.”

“Hey, Dad,” William, age 4, blurted while standing on one of the kitchen chairs. “Which one of us were you talking to?”

“Who do you think I was talking to?” I responded with a smile.

Pointing at Twinkie, William replied, “The girl down there.” Again, notice Twinkie is just a girl, another sister, a female, not a dog.

One evening I called home from a weekly date with TerriLu just to see how the kids were doing. Michael, age 10, answered the phone and explained that they were training the puppy, Twinkie.

As he spelled out the command words, he said, “We’re teaching Twinkie to S-I-T and to C-O-M-E.”

“Why are you spelling the words?” I asked.

“Because Twinkie’s right here.” As if spelling the words would make a difference. I guess Michael was afraid if he said the command words, heaven forbid, Twinkie might sit or come.

One day William and I waited inside Dr. Betts’ veterinary clinic while Mom took Twinkie outside for a quick walk to do her business. As William and I stared out the window at Mom and the puppy, William, age 4, observed, “There are two people inside and there are two people outside.” Not a person and a dog outside, but two people.

There are actual contests to show dogs and owners that look alike, and in many cases and in many cases it’s hard to tell who’s the dog and who’s the person. One time we took Twinkie with us up to see my parents. With Twinkie’s white curly hair on her head and her persnickety personality, my mom remarked that Twinkie reminded her a lot of her Aunt Esther. Mom had a beautiful picture of Aunt Esther wearing her glasses. We found some glasses that looked similar to Aunt Esther’s, put them on Twinkie, set Twinkie next to the photograph, and sure enough, we almost had twins.

Brindle Smiling

Interestingly, no one has wanted to claim to look like Brindle with her snaggletooth grin, sagging jowls, bloodshot eyes, and constant drool. I suppose I came the closest, especially with the constant drool, but Brindle was actually so ugly she was cute and she had the sweetest personality and disposition that you just couldn’t help falling in love with her.

When we first brought Brindle home Twinkie was quite disgusted with this new creature introduced into the family pack. A hairy, smelly thing, not too dissimilar from me, that just didn’t belong. So at first they didn’t get along all that well.

At one point, Twinkie’s demeanor changed, and she was a bit crestfallen when she correctly surmised that she, too, like Brindle, was just a dog. Her depression lasted only a few days though when she suddenly realized that the rest of us in the family pack were dogs, too. We just were a different breed of dog that looked different, and in fact, according to Twinkie, a bit homelier in comparison to her, and we didn’t smell nearly as good as she and Brindle smelled.

The pack hierarchy has changed a little over the years, primarily with Twinkie trying to assert a higher position in the pack. She really wanted to be just below me, the chief alpha dog. She felt her place was up there with at least Melissa the oldest child and just one rung under the alpha-dog pack leaders, Mom and Dad. Her real position was probably just under Jonathan, child number three, but she never believed it. Brindle never really cared about her position in the pack—she was just buddies with her best friend, Jonathan, and she liked everyone else in the pack, too. To her, nothing else really mattered.

When we first got Twinkie, she was so cute and small that we made the mistake of letting her sleep with TerriLu and me, the pack leaders. When Twinkie started getting jealous of TerriLu. If TerriLu just put her arm over to touch me, Twinkie would let out a low growl. That didn’t set well with TerriLu or me so Twinkie got demoted immediately and had to sleep with Melissa. Besides, TerriLu didn’t want a smelly dog sleeping with her anyway—a smelly husband was enough.

At first Twinkie was a little put out, but one step down wasn’t too bad. When Melissa traipsed off to college, Twinkie got demoted again and had to sleep with Michael, which was a small blow to Twinkie’s ego. But at least with Melissa gone, Michael now became the next position down from the pack leaders. When Michael trotted off to school, things got ugly. Brindle was already sleeping on Jonathan’s bed so Jonny wasn’t about to take in Twinkie. This meant that Twinkie got double demoted all the way down to William, the very bottom of the hierarchy. Even after several weeks of counseling therapy, Twinkie still couldn’t handle the idea of being at the bottom of the food chain.

Twinkie’s pride and self-esteem suffered a bit, but with even more counseling sessions and heavy doses of Prozac she worked through it quite well.

Every evening Twinkie would sneak into the master bedroom, jump up on the bed, and try to blend in with the bedspread. She thought that if she lay perfectly still, she would coordinate like a chameleon, with only her eyes moving as they followed TerriLu and me around the bedroom as we got ready for bed. She never figured out how I could suddenly spot her and scoop her up and cart her off to sleep with William when she was so cleverly incognito.

Oh, the inhumanity of it all. To have to sleep with William. Well, at about three o’clock in the morning Twinkie would jump off William’s bed and scratch at his door and whine until William got up and opened the door to let her out. Then she came over to the master bedroom door with the same scratching and whining routine. Sometimes I would just haul her back to William’s room with a good scolding, but usually she’d be back and I’d just let get on our bed.

If it was after 6:00 a.m. I would let Twinkie out and she’d follow me downstairs while I read the morning newspaper. If I wasn’t sharing any food, then Twinkie would head up to catch a quick nap with TerriLu. To sleep on the alpha bed, even for a short time, was still a small victory for Twinkie.

When we finally had to put Brindle down, Twinkie became my shadow. Anywhere I went in the house, she followed behind me. If I left the house, she’d wait at the door for my return. And when William left for college, Twinkie again got to sleep with the alpha dogs. She sort of even took over second position ahead of TerriLu. Twinkie would snuggle between us, usually closer to me. If I got to bed before TerriLu, Twinkie would sometimes stretch out right in TerriLu’s place and then mumbled under her breath when TerriLu tried to move her over so she could climb into bed. Near the end of her life Twinkie had a collapsed trachea, among other problems, so she snored and wheezed and snorted and coughed quite loudly throughout the night. Sometimes it was too much for TerriLu who would then move to one of the guest bedroom’s to get a goodnight’s sleep. Triumph for Twinkie!

Two New Grandchildren in 2010 for a Total of Twelve

Leave a comment

Nammy (TerriLu) and I (Papa) have two new grandchildren, courtesy of 2010. Well, actually, courtesy of Heidi and Michael who had a boy in October and Rick and Melissa who had a boy in mid-December.

So here’s the breakdown on Nammy and Papa’s wonderful children and grandchildren as of mid-December 2010:

Rick and Melissa Millward:
          Brenna Lu, age 8 ¾ years
          Joshua Brian, age 7 ¾ years
          Madalyn Elaine, age 6 ½ years
          Braden Andrew, age 4 ½ years
          Asher William, age 2 ½ years
          Jacob Dwight, age 1 year
          Drew Michael, age less than a week

Heidi and Michael Ross:
          Laneah, age 4 ¾ years
          Donovan Michael, age 3 years
          Emerson Taft, age 3 months

Michelle and Jonathan Ross:
          Kylie Evelyn, age 3 years
          Taylor Alexis, age 1 ½ years

William Ross IV:
          Five nieces and seven nephews above

That’s a grand total of twelve grandchildren, five girls and seven boys, with certainly more to come in the future. And the above nineteen people make life great for Nammy and Papa!

Merry Christmas 2010

Leave a comment

Bill and TerriLu Ross Family History for 2010. Email: RossIdaho@gmail.com.

So I’m finally starting a blog as an outlet for my writing. First, I’m going to publish this year’s Family Christmas Newsletter which is getting too long to snailmail to everyone on our mailing distribution list. Every year when I sit down to write the Christmas Newsletter, I can’t think of anything to write and I assume the entire newsletter will fit on one sheet of paper maximum. But after I get started, ideas keep coming and eventually I end up writing a tome, of sorts. But part of the purpose in writing the newsletter is to have a family history of the year that the family can look back on in the future. So it serves its purpose with lots of detail to remember the year’s events and activities. The reader can always just skim the headlines and get the gist of the year’s events without the details, but you’ll miss the humor.